Skip to main content

Tag: land conservation

Green Living: Willow-Witt Ranch

By Robert Hastings for Mail Tribune, on March 4, 2021.

Suzanne Willow in front of the barn and Farm Store at Willow-Witt Ranch

Conservation of native habitats goes a long way in helping residents get the most out of their real estate and Suzanne and Lanita are here to help you learn how. The ranch holds summer classes and talks along with hikes and activities for kids and adults of all ages to come learn more about the ecosystems in Southern Oregon and how a symbiotic relationship with their surroundings is beneficial to their health and others in the long run.

Mail Tribune

Continue reading

Land defenders on heightened alert one year after Trump shrinks U.S. monuments

Land defenders on heightened alert one year after Trump shrinks U.S. monuments

U.S. conservation groups have rallied to protect other at-risk areas

Written by Gregory Scruggs for PLACE, January 7, 2019. Posted in News.

Dave Willis, President of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, sits on his horse in the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, Oregon, USA

Dave Willis, President of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, sits on his horse in the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, Oregon, USA. Photo taken September 7, 2018. Thomson Reuters Foundation/Gregory Scruggs

OREGON – One year after U.S. President Donald Trump declared the biggest rollback of public land protection in the country’s history, conservation groups have rallied to protect other at-risk places.

In December 2017, Trump announced that Utah’s Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments would be shrunk by 2 million acres (809,000 hectares), from a combined 3.2 million acres, to expand hunting and grazing.

The Department of the Interior (DOI) then recommended cutting by an unspecified amount another four protected sites, including Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, a biodiversity reserve on the Oregon-California border.

That followed a seven-month DOI review of 27 monuments that had been established or expanded since 1996. The review was part of a broader push by the Trump administration to reopen areas to drilling, mining and other development.

Unlike national parks, which require an act of Congress, national monuments can be designated unilaterally by presidents under the century-old Antiquities Act, a law meant to protect sacred sites, artifacts and historical objects.

Public land advocates have challenged the administration in federal court over the legality of removing protection from sites that had been designated under the act.

Monuments for All, which defends national monuments but is not involved in the court case, said that more than 500,000 comments were submitted in support of the Utah monuments during a public comment period that closed in November 2018.

Terry Dickey, chairman of the Friends of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, which supports the court case, said “an attack on one monument is an attack on all monuments”.

“Because it’s the same national law that governs those monuments as well as our one small monument,” Dickey told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

SACRED GROUND

Trump’s targeting of the protected areas came as he sought to reverse a slew of environmental protections ushered in by former President Barack Obama under the Antiquities Act.

Trump said those protections hobbled economic growth – cheering industry and angering conservationists.

The case against the administration is being heard in Washington, D.C. after an unsuccessful attempt to move proceedings to Utah. In November, five Native American tribes filed briefs on behalf of Bears Ears, which they deem sacred.

The cuts to the two Utah monuments have gone into effect, although in September the judge in the federal case ruled the government must inform the plaintiffs of any mining applications submitted for land inside the original larger boundaries.

Cuts to the other four, including the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, are pending.

BIODIVERSITY BONANZA

In January 2017 – days before he left office – then-President Obama expanded the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument by about 48,000 acres.

Obama’s proclamation was welcome news to Dave Willis, who leads the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, a conservation group that lobbied in the 1980s for tens of thousands of acres to be set aside as wilderness in what became the national monument.

“The monument was established first in 2000 because of its importance as an ecological crossroads and its incredible biodiversity,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

In 2015, 85 scientists endorsed a report for the monument’s expansion to include more high-elevation terrain and a broader range of habitat for species like newts and owls.

“The monument (was) in jeopardy in its original size because of logging and other development around the original monument,” Willis said, adding that its biodiversity had been under threat prior to its 2017 expansion.

Willis showed stands of towering old-growth trees slated for logging until the expanded monument boundaries protected them.

“There’s not much old forest like this left.”

Other sections were crisscrossed by forest roads and pockmarked with stumps in areas already harvested for timber. Those tracts, he said, could be restored.

A DOI spokesman declined to comment on whether the proposed cuts would threaten biodiversity and pointed to a December 2017 report recommending that the monument be reduced.

Residents of southern Oregon listen to a field lecture by a local geologist organized by the Friends of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, USA

Residents of southern Oregon listen to a field lecture by a local geologist organized by the Friends of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, USA. Photo taken September 8, 2018. Thomson Reuters Foundation/Gregory Scruggs

LOCAL SUPPORT

The expanded Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is popular in southern Oregon, prompting local officials and business leaders to rally for its preservation.

Visitors base themselves out of the nearby valley towns of Ashland and Talent to hike its trails, including a section of the Pacific Crest Trail.

During the DOI’s monument review, mayors of both towns submitted letters urging it to maintain the expanded boundaries, as did Oregon politicians and legislators, local tribes and chambers of commerce.

“Oregonians value the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument,” Willis said, citing a review that showed more than 99 percent of 1.3 million respondents who submitted comments to the DOI had called for national monument boundaries to be left untouched.

“Across the country, Americans value their national monuments as national treasures,” said Willis.

However, some have welcomed the review: the American Forest Resource Council (AFRC), a timber lobby group, has a case in court seeking to stop Obama’s Cascade-Siskiyou monument expansion, because it includes land designated by a 1937 federal law for “permanent forest production”.

AFRC president Travis Joseph said industry did not believe a presidential proclamation could supersede an act of Congress.

“Who gets to make the law for public lands? Congress, as envisioned by the constitution, or the president, without congressional approval or judicial review?” Joseph told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“In our mind, it’s critical that Congress and the public have a say over their public lands.”

NORTH AMERICAN LEGACY

The consequence of the Trump administration’s decisions is that the United States lags its neighbours on the rate at which it conserves land, according to a report by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think-tank.

“This administration is taking us backward when it comes to preserving our nation’s wildlife and natural places,” said Ryan Richards, a policy analyst at the center, adding that the United States was previously a pioneer in conservation.

Willis lamented the trend, and said history had proven the popularity of public land conservation.

“So many national parks were presidentially proclaimed monuments first – Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Death Valley, Joshua Tree, Olympic, Arches – and the locals didn’t really like those monuments,” he said.

“But the next generation and the generation after that liked the monuments so much that they got Congress to protect them as parks. It becomes the basis for the new economy.”

Conde Nast Traveler

Condé Nast Traveler

See original article with photos

Continue reading

Willow-Witt Farm: Powered by solar energy, passion for the land

Willow-Witt Farm: Powered by solar energy, passion for the land

Willow-Witt Ranch is a small organic farm on 440 acres in Oregon. Its emphasis is sustainable agriculture and conservation.

Written by Robin Dalmas for Business Circle February 2017. Posted in News.

Willow-Witt Ranch was a semi-finalist in Business Circle’s 2016 Real Stories Contest. This video was created by John Grimshaw.

Suzanne Willow and Lanita Witt went looking for a large patch of land in the 1980s so they could do small-scale farming. It had to be above 3,500 feet to avoid poison oak, and it had to be in the Ashland, Oregon school district for their daughter, who was 10 at the time.

“We were looking for 40 to 100 acres,” Willow said. “We found 440 instead.”

From the air, the acreage looks like a perfect Oregon postcard brimming with lush green meadows and thick forests of pine and fir. Snow-capped Mt. Shasta, over the border in California, towers in the distance. The closest town, Ashland, Oregon, hosts the Oregon Shakespeare Festival every year.

Because the land is at 5,000 feet, winter lasts about 6 months. “We found the land under 4 feet of snow and just thought it was the most exquisite place in the whole world.” In 1985, Willow and Witt bought the land and established Willow-Witt Ranch.

Today, Willow-Witt Ranch produces alpine goats for milk and backpacking, chickens for meat and eggs, and a variety of cold-hardy vegetables such as onions and garlic. They also raise Italian Maremma, a breed of livestock guard dog. The certified organic farm has kept operations small so it can practice sustainable agriculture.

The ranch also offers farm stays. The farmhouse studio sleeps six, the meadow house sleeps 10, rustic furnished wall tents sleep four, and a traditional campsite beckons for those who wish to pitch their own tent.

Visitors who come to stay are often quite surprised to learn the ranch’s little secret: It’s completely off the grid.

“People have no idea that we are off grid until we tell them. You would have no idea that your electricity was coming from the sun.”

The ranch has four solar voltaic systems powering everything from the barn to the guest accommodations. Solar energy powers the refrigerators, freezers, washing machines, and lighting. Propane gas powers the cooking ranges and creates heat for the clothes dryer. WildBlue® high speed satellite Internet powers the web surfing. At 5,000 feet, the sun shines often, but when it doesn’t, diesel generators kick in as a backup to the solar power.

But what about the toilets? “That’s a common question,” Willow said. “Toilets run on water and gravity; they don’t need electricity.” Waste goes into a septic system.

Despite its remote location, Willow-Witt Ranch leans on technology every day to keep operations running smoothly. Solar technology presents interesting challenges. “For the accommodations, we have a lot of laundry,” said Willow. “Every once in a while, we do have to run a generator for laundry, but we really batch it, and get on it pretty fast when the sun comes out so we don’t have to use the generator.”

The farm stay reservation system is all online. The ranch sells its meat, eggs, and milk on its e-commerce website as well as a small farm store in the barn, at the local growers market, and to Oregon restaurants. The staff uses an iPad with Square attached to sell items in the farm store, which not only includes meat and egg products, but organic graham crackers, chocolate, and marshmallows so kids can make s’mores. The iPad is also used to check in guests for the farm stays.

“Most people make hay when the sun shines. We do laundry when the sun shines.”

A designated contractor posts to social media such as Facebook and Twitter. That person uses Dropbox to access the photos for social media. In the early years, Willow did all the bookkeeping on paper; she now uses QuickBooks.

Willow and Witt, who are married, both had traditional careers. Willow was a physician’s assistant and Witt was a physician. Now that they are “retired,” the ranch keeps them busy 24/7. “We stopped working in town and now we’re ‘only farmers.’ That’s our joke,” Willow said.

While the two continue to farm and host visitors, they have a greater mission. Their main emphasis is on conservation and restoration of a unique piece of property. When they first bought it, they inherited a historic ranch with rundown buildings from the 1920s, heavily eroded land that had been used for cattle farming for 150 years, and a forest that had been commercially logged. Willow and Witt have worked tirelessly to restore the buildings, fence the wetlands and meadows to protect them from grazing, and restore the forest ecosystem.

In the coming year, the farmers hope to start a nonprofit with the goal of conservation, restoration, and education. “Educating people about land, conservation, and where food comes from,” Willow said. “That’s what excites me.”

Ultimately, the goal is to tread lightly for future generations to enjoy.

“We’ve kept our farm endeavors small enough that we were not going to be impacting the land. If we left tomorrow, and all our animals left tomorrow, and our vegetables left tomorrow, the land would be just fine. There would be nothing to cure.”

Business Circle brought to you by AT&T

Business Circle

See original article

Continue reading